Legal Opinion

Ives v. City of Willimantic

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1936PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The city of Willimantic owned a reservoir and ice houses on its shores, with equipment for harvesting ice, which under its charter it was authorized to distribute to its inhabitants. For many years prior to 1929 the plaintiff had distributed the ice harvested by the defendant under an operating agreement with it which ran from year to year. On January 10th, 1929, the parties executed an agreement covering the sale of ice harvested by the defendant to the plaintiff and its distribution by him for a term of five years, with an option in the plaintiff to renew the agreement for a further period…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lakitsch v. BrandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. McGarrigle v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API