Legal Opinion

Wells v. Carson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWykhe, J.

The basic facts in this case are not controverted. The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage on property in Stonington. The mortgage was executed by Denison A. Chesebro to his son, Erastus D. Chesebro, under date of May 23, 1912. The plaintiff was the wife of Erastus and acquired title to the mortgage on March 8,1937, from her husband’s estate. At the time of the execution of the mortgage, the property was owned by Denison A. Chesebro. Upon his death on October 17, 1915, the property passed by descent to his three children, Erastus, Annie E. Northrup and the defendant Mima J. Carson.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Freund v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Potter v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Blakeman v. FondaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  5. Sears v. HoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zapolsky v. SacksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Advest, Inc. v. WachtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Gervais v. Riddle & Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  4. Seaboard Burner Corporation v. DeLongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  5. Owens v. DoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API