Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Belknap Motor Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine

Decided November 12, 1900No. 517PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of a patent. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This case relates to applied dynamic electricity with reference to some of its most complicated and delicate phases. A thorough understanding of the purposes which the inventor sought to accomplish, and of the principles applicable there*64hb,: in the absence of a thorough" explanation by experts' 'of both practical and scientific attainments in the art, requires a mastery of the particular science to which the patent in suit relates; Although the patent issued in March, 1895, the inventor’s device never has gone into commercial use," and no practical machine illustrating…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Saxlehner v. Siegel-Cooper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Packard v. Lacing Stud Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
  5. Munson v. Straits of Dover S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  2. National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. Julius Kessler & Co. v. GoldstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. General Chemical Co. v. Selden Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API