Legal Opinion

Coupe v. Royer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1895No. 53PublishedCited by 148 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. This was an action of trespass on the case, brought in October, 1889, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts, by Herman and Louis Koyer against William Coupe and Edwin A. Burgess for an alleged infringement of letters patent of the United States, No. /T/T,920, dated May 12, 1868, for an “ improved machine for treating hides.”

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. This was an action of trespass on the case, brought in October, 1889, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts, by Herman and Louis Koyer against William Coupe and Edwin A. Burgess for an alleged infringement of letters patent of the United States, No. /T/T,920, dated May 12, 1868, for an “ improved machine for treating hides.” The patent expired on May 12, 1885, and this suit was entered July 14, 1885. The trial resulted, on November 10, 1886, in a verdict for the plaintiffs…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras

The plaintiffs describe their invention as a new and improved machine for converting raw hides into leather, of that class which is used for belting, lacings, and other purposes where it is necessary to preserve the native strength and toughness without destroying or impairing the natural fibres or grain of the leather.

The machine, is composed of a vertical slotted shaft provided with set-screws, which said shaft is capable of being revolved, by suitable mechanism, first in one direction and then in the other; a circularly-arranged set of pins or rollers set in rings or fixed heads, the same…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API