Saxlehner v. Siegel-Cooper Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ' The case is stated in the opinion. Counsel were the same as in No. 29.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
These three cases were brought against retail dealers, and defended by the Eisner and Mendelson Company, who imported and furnished- the defendants with the water sold by them. The bills charged the defendants generally with unlawfully selling bitter water under labels simulating Saxlehner’s blue and red label, and under the name “ Hunyadi.” The answer was substantially the same as that in the main case, and the same record of proofs was used.
In the case against the Siegel-Cooper Company there was no charge of an intentional fraud, and the court found there was no evidence of fraudulent…
2Cited by41 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Q-Tips, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.