Crisman v. Lanterman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
On June 18, 1895, Ammoretta J. Lanterman made her promissory note for five thousand dollars, payable to Frederick S. Crisman or order, on or before ten years after date. With the note, and as security for it, she delivered to Crisman a mortgage of the south eighty acres of lot 9 of the Rancho la Canada, in Los Angeles County, and certain shares of stock in a water company. The property mortgaged stood of record in the name of Ammoretta J. Lanterman, but in fact it belonged to Roy S. Lanterman, her son, and the note and mortgage were given in consideration of a loan of five thousand dollars by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Pacific Valley Bank v. SchwenkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Braun v. CrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.