Moore v. Gould
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James H. Blanchard, William E. Cox, and Will D. Gould, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action on two promissory notes, secured by two mortgages of real estate and by a pledge of stock of a corporation. Plaintiff had judgment of foreclosure, and the defendants, Will D. Gould, Mary L. Gould, Samuel Peterson, and James H. Blanchard, appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
On July 18, 1892, the defendant Peterson executed to the defendant Will D. Gould a note for seven hundred dollars, payable on or before one year after date, and at the same time executed and delivered to said Gould a mortgage of certain real property in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.