Legal Opinion

Pacific Valley Bank v. Schwenke

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1987No. H000602PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAUER, J.

This appeal presents a novel question in the field of mortgage and trust deed law: Is the co-maker of a promissory note entitled to enforce the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 726 (the so-called “one-action rule”) even though he is not a party to the deed of trust securing the debt? We decide that he is so entitled.

Statement of Facts

There is no dispute about the facts which follow. Robert Schwenke and Terry O’Brien were partners in a business known as S. & O.B. Enterprises which engaged in property development. On April 15, 1981, Robert and Ute Schwenke…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. First Nationwide Savings v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe and Takeout III, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. O'NEIL v. General Security Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API