Legal Opinion

Viking Bank v. Firgrove Commons 3, LLC

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 2014No. 44925-1-IIPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.

¶1

Firgrove Commons 3 LLC appeals the trial court’s declaratory judgment that its tenant Viking Bank does not owe management fees Firgrove incurred with respect to its lease with Viking Bank. Firgrove argues that Viking Bank is responsible for the management fees because the lease provides for “triple net” rent1 and states that the tenant will pay all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the leased property. Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 16. However, we hold that when viewed as a whole, the lease does not require Viking Bank to pay management fees. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Firgrove…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Larry Riley v. Iron Gate Self StorageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  3. Rsd Aap Llc v. Alyeska Ocean Llc& Jeff & Jane Doe Hendrick'sCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. John Ley v. Clark County Public Transportation Benefit AreaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. King County v. Vinci Construction Grands Projets/Parsons RCI/Frontier-Kemper, JVCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API