Legal Opinion
Rittmann v. Amazon.com, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 23, 2019No. CASE NO. C16-1554-JCCPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. No. 36). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby DENIES the motion for the reasons explained herein.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are delivery drivers working for Defendants Amazon.com or Amazon Logistics. (Dkt. No. 76 at 1.) Plaintiffs are parties to individual contracts with Defendants (collectively, the "contract"), and Defendants have classified Plaintiffs as independent…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Byars v. Dart Transit CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Converse v. Vizio, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Cunningham v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- EASTERDAY v. USPACK LOGISTICS LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.