Buermann v. Morris
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.
The present action is one in tort for the alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife. The defendants answered with a general denial. The present motion is for a bill of particulars.
It is apparent and not controverted that the complaint is in such form ,and the action is of such a nature that the defendants would be entitled to many of the particulars requested if the demand therefor had been made before answer filed.
“The bill of particulars has the two-fold effect of informing the defendant with relation to the details of the plaintiff’s ease with a view of preparation of a proper…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tilton v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Galganski v. AndrysiakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Donnell v. BreuningerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Wigler v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1932
- Katin v. CrispelAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1944
- Tierney v. TierneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Walter v. BenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.