Legal Opinion

Buermann v. Morris

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodine, J.

The present action is one in tort for the alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife. The defendants answered with a general denial. The present motion is for a bill of particulars.

It is apparent and not controverted that the complaint is in such form ,and the action is of such a nature that the defendants would be entitled to many of the particulars requested if the demand therefor had been made before answer filed.

“The bill of particulars has the two-fold effect of informing the defendant with relation to the details of the plaintiff’s ease with a view of preparation of a proper…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tilton v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Johnson v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. Galganski v. AndrysiakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. BreuningerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
  2. Wigler v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1932
  3. Katin v. CrispelAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1944
  4. Tierney v. TierneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Walter v. BenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API