Legal Opinion
O'Donnell v. Breuninger
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 11, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 2581-49PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion by the defendant under Rule 37(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., for an order to compel plaintiff to answer questions upon a discovery deposition, and a motion by plaintiff under Rule 30(b) for an order that certain matters shall not be inquired into by defendant, of plaintiff, upon the discovery deposition.
This is an action for alienation of affections and loss of consortium brought by a husband. Count 1 of the complaint alleges, in part, that during the summer of 1943 and continuing up to and including March…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tilton v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Cogdill v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1947
- Benevento v. A. & P. Food Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- de Antonio v. SolomonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966
- Dunn v. Evening Star Newspaper CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Marquardt-Glenn Corp. v. Lumelite Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.