Tierney v. Tierney
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Herr, A. M.
To the petitioner’s amended petition for divorce the defendant filed an answer and counter-claim, and being met by a special replication and an answer to the counter-claim served a demand for a bill of particulars respecting certain allegations contained therein. Hpon petitioner’s refusal to furnish such particulars, defendant applied to the court for an order requiring that they be furnished. The particulars sought are as follows :
1. In paragraph 3 of the counter-claim the defendant alleges that on May 1st, 1920, “petitioner and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lefever v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Buermann v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Paper C., MacHinery Co. v. NewlinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Wolfson v. MillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohrs v. Igoe Brothers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Barnes v. P. D. Manufacturing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936