Tilton v. . Beecher
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the general term of the city court of Brooklyn, affirming an order of the special term of that court refusing to grant an order for a bill of particulars in this action.
1Opinion of the CourtRapallo, J.
— There is no uncertainty or indefiniteness in respect to the nature of the charge made against the defendant. The difficulty under which he claims to be laboring is that the complaint does not point out the times or occasions when the alleged offenses are claimed to have been committed, but avers simply that they were committed on the 10th of October, 1868, and divers other days and times after that day and before the commencement of this action, thus covering á period of very nearly s’x years, the action having been commenced in August, 1874. He denies that the acts charged were ever…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tracey v. . AltmyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Montgomery v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1780
- Humphry v. CottleyouNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Ogden v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
- Vischer v. ConantNew York Supreme Court · 1825
3Cited by140 opinions
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- People v. . StedekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Dwight v. . Germania Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Clarke v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.