Galganski v. Andrysiak

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

Defendants’ attorney served a demand for a bill of particulars on plaintiffs’ attorney, and the latter at the time agreed to make reply thereto; later plaintiffs’ attorney refused to render the bill of particulars upon the ground that defendants’ answer was filed prior to the serving of the demand and that, under the rules and eases, the demand was therefore untimely; whereupon defendants’ attorney, on notice, applied for an order directing that the particulars be furnished.

The action sounds in tort. Hopper v. Gillett, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 63,…