City of Fairfield v. Hutcheon
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
At a special election called by the city of Fairfield on April 13, 1948, the voters of the city approved by more than a two-thirds vote four propositions to create a bonded indebtedness of $125,000. The first two proposed that a bonded indebtedness be incurred “for the improvement of . . . water works and water system, by the acquisition of certain land therefor, the repair, replacement and extension of the water mains in and for said City of Fairfield, the acquisition of an additional storage tank and booster pump, and equipment for said improvement of said water works and water system. ...”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City & County of San Francisco v. LinaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Sacramento v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Redlands v. BrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Resource Defense Fund v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- City of Oxnard v. DaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Forde v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. SpinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. City of Garden GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.