Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Linares
California Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1940No. S. F. 16429PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an application for the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as Secretary of the Board of Park Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco, to publish the call for bids and to receive sealed proposals for a fifty-year lease of the subsurface space beneath Union Square, for the purpose of erecting and constructing therein a public automobile garage and parking station.
As a return to the alternative writ the respondent has filed a general demurrer to the petition.
The Town of San Francisco, predecessor of the City and County of San Francisco, acquired title to this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Spires v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Slavich v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Harter v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Barnes v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Omaha Parking Authority v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.