State v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MacLatjghlin, Justice.
This is an appeal by the state pursuant to Minn. St. 632.11 from a pretrial order of the St. Paul municipal court which, because of an alleged illegal arrest, suppressed certain evidence in a prosecution under § 169.121, specifically, statements made by defendant to police after defendant’s arrest and results of a blood alcohol test. We reverse.
At approximately 8:45 p. m. on August 6, 1973, one Richard Schoumaker drove his automobile through a red light, causing the vehicle to collide with an automobile driven by defendant. After talking with defendant, Schoumaker asked…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Alexander GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Strand v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. KinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. DilgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. NoltingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.