Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 11, 1983No. 11515), (11516), (11517), 11518PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In each of these cases the state, with the permission of the trial court, has appealed from a judgment dismissing the information with prejudice pursuant to the state’s own motion. The defendants have filed motions in this court to dismiss the appeals upon several grounds: (1) that the request for permission to appeal was so untimely that the trial court abused its discretion in granting it; (2) that, since it was the state which requested the dismissals, it cannot appeal therefrom; (3) that the state is really attempting to appeal an interlocutory ruling of the trial court which granted the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.