Holtz v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court sustaining the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license for refusing to submit to chemical testing under Minn.Stat. § 169.123, (1982), the implied consent law. Appellant raises two issues: whether reasonable and probable grounds existed to invoke the implied consent law and whether appellant was properly advised of his rights and obligations under the implied consent statute. 1
At approximately 1:00 a.m. on April 20, 1982, Orono police officers determined by radar that a vehicle had been speeding.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. AbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kozak v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Hager v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Schafer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Rude v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.