State v. Reitter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 1. This case is before the court on certification by the court of appeals, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61 (1995-96). The issue is whether a police officer is required to advise a custodial defendant, charged with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, that the right to counsel does not apply to the administration of a chemical test under Wisconsin's implied consent statute, Wis. Stat. § 343.305. A related question, whether the due process clause of the Wisconsin Constitution imposes an affirmative duty upon police officers to advise defendants that the right to counsel does…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PiddingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Mogard v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Gary F. LembergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Navdeep S. BrarWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.