Legal Opinion
State v. Navdeep S. Brar
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 2017No. 2015AP001261-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J.
We review an unpublished decision of the court of appeals1 affirming the conviction of Navdeep Brar (Brar) for operating while intoxicated, third offense in *692violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(l)(b) (2013-14)2 and an order of the circuit court denying Brar's motion to suppress the results of a blood test.3
¶ 2. Brar moved to suppress the results of a blood test on the grounds that it was an unconstitutional search. Specifically, he argued that he did not consent to having his blood drawn, and therefore, the officer was required to obtain a warrant. The circuit…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Dawn M. PradoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. Gerald P. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Faith N. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Peo v. TarrColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Brar, Navdeep v. Mahoney, DavidDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.