Legal Opinion

State v. Piddington

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2001No. 99-1250-CRPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. Michael Pid-dington seeks review of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a circuit court order which had suppressed the test results of Piddington's blood for alcohol. State v. Piddington, 2000 WI App 44, 233 Wis. 2d 257, 607 N.W.2d 303. Piddington was tested after he was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI). The circuit court had concluded that Piddington, who has been profoundly deaf since birth, needed an American Sign Language interpreter to fully understand the field sobriety tests and the information that he was to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Sonneborn v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. DouangmalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State v. FaustWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KrajewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API