Legal Opinion

Mogard v. City of Laramie

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2001No. 00-217PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] The appellant, Bennie J. Mogard, was arrested in Laramie for driving while under the influence. Upon being advised of the implied consent to chemical testing provisions of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 31-6-102(32)() (LexisNexis 2001), the appellant asked to speak to an attorney before submitting to the test. That request was denied. Subsequent ly, based upon this denial, he filed a Motion to Suppress Breath Test in the municipal court. Citing Wheeler v. State, 705 P.2d 861, 863 (Wyo.1985), the municipal judge denied the motion on the ground that there is no constitutional right to…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wyatt L. Bear CloudWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fertig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Rackoff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API