Legal Opinion
Raley v. Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 22, 1959No. 175PublishedCited by 354 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
These two appeals involve convictions of four appellants for refusal to answer certain questions put to them at sessions of the “Un-American Activities Commission” of the State of Ohio, established in the legislative branch of the Ohio Government. The appellants had claimed the privilege against self ^incrimination in refusing to answer each of the questions. The cases are before us for the second time; on prior appeals the judgments below were vacated and the causes remanded for reconsideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by354 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.