Legal Opinion

State v. Huebner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2000No. 98-2470-CRPublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJon P. Wilcox, J.

¶ 1. The issue in this case, is whether a defendant who did not object to the use of a six-person jury at his misdemeanor trial, as authorized by Wis. Stat. § 756.096(3)(am), may obtain a new trial in reliance on State v. Hansford's holding that § 756.096(3)(am) is unconstitutional. We conclude that he may not.

I — I

¶ 2. On February 18, 1998, the defendant Juergen Huebner was tried and convicted of two misdemeanors in the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County, Clare L. Fiorenza, Judge. The verdict in Huebner's case was rendered by a six-person jury, under the authority of Wis. Stat. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Village of Trempealeau v. MikrutWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. WeedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Schill v. Wisconsin Rapids School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. Ronald KnipferWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API