Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Hartman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1966No. Civ. 8051PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action claiming treble the amount of interest paid for usury. From a judgment in favor of defendants plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff, owner in fee simple of a parcel of unimproved property, (here called the Brookhurst property), entered into a long term lease on April 7, 1959, with several individuals. The lease provided, among others, that lessees (1) should make improvements on the land in the minimum amount of $75,000 and within a stated time from the date of the lease; (2) would hold lessor harmless from any and all liens arising from the improvements and there should…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In re Grand Union Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. Payne v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mosebach v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1979
  2. Guthman v. MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Lee v. MarchettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. ROES v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API