Guthman v. Moss
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In this case we are called upon to determine whether a clause in which a buyer of residential real property agrees to pay liquidated damages is unenforceable as a matter of law when the clause is not separately signed or initialed by buyer and seller pursuant to California Civil Code 1 section 1677.
While the Legislature has not provided any express guidelines for the enforceability of a clause which fails to meet the formal requirements in that section, we hold that the Legislature did not intend such clauses to be rendered unenforceable as a matter of law. We further hold…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Tracy v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Castro v. Sacramento County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Little v. CFS Service Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fergus v. SongerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.