Legal Opinion

ROES v. Wong

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1999No. D026021PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

The question presented here is whether a junior lienholder in real property, who assumes senior indebtedness to preserve his equity in that property, is entitled to assert the usury laws against the senior lenders. Applying the constitutional and statutory prohibitions against usury, which are for the benefit of the borrower or a personal representative of the borrower, we answer this question in the negative.

Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant Bradley Holcom was a licensed real estate agent who arranged the sale of trust deeds for clients looking to invest in loans…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McDowell & Craig v. City of Santa Fe SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bisno v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Washburn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. Adel Yamout v. Jeffry ScapaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  5. Bisno v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API