Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1975No. Civ. 46392PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COBEY, Acting P. J.

Stanley Fitch’ appeals from a judgment for respondents Pacific. Fidelity Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called “Pacific”) and Manny Silberman following a trial to the court. The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a).)

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in enforcing an agreement (hereinafter sometimes called “termination assignment agreement”) between himself and both respondents assigning to Silberman commissions on insurance policies which accrued following the termination by respondents of his position as an insurance salesman for them.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Dorsic v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Lande v. JurisichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Buck v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Franklin v. AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Central National Bank of Wausau v. DustinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Guthman v. MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Niroo v. NirooCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Bunner v. Imperial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API