Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Gibbons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 2004No. 00DO 1913 DS; A117837PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Wife appeals from a dissolution judgment. She contends that the trial court erred in its division of the parties’ property and in its award of spousal and child support. Husband cross-appeals, assigning error to the property division on the ground that the court erred in its finding that husband had failed to rebut the statutory presumption that wife had contributed equally to the acquisition of 30 shares of stock in a closely held corporation. Our review is de novo. ORS 19.415(3) (2001).1 We modify the dissolution judgment to require husband to pay wife an equalizing judgment for the value…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In re the Marriage of BidwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. In re the Marriage of BidwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Matter of Marriage of ReilingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BranscombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. In Re the Marriage of CassezzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. In Re the Marriage of ClappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. In re the Marriage of GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API