In re the Marriage of Bidwell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment awarding wife $17,817,297 as compensation for her share of his company. He argues that, rather than awarding wife a compensating judgment, the trial court should have ordered the sale of the company and a proportional distribution of the net proceeds to the parties. We affirm.
Before their marriage, the parties cohabitated for approximately six months. During that time, husband acquired and became the sole owner of a small discount brokerage house, which he later renamed Bidwell & Company. The parties married in 1985. In 1996, husband filed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Matter of Marriage of FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- In re the Marriage of WatsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Matter of Marriage of TaraghiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schuman v. SchumanNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Marriage of BidwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- In re the Marriage of GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- In re the Marriage of PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of BidwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.