Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Stice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1989No. TC CV87-0424; CA A47952; SC S35939PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

ORS 107.105(l)(f) provides in part:

“Whenever the court grants a decree of marital annulment, dissolution or separation, it has the power further to decree as follows:
“For the division or other disposition between the parties of the real or personal property, or both, of either or both of the parties as may be just and proper in all the circumstances. * * * The court shall consider the contribution of a spouse as a homemaker as a contribution to the acquisition of marital assets. There is a rebuttable presumption that both spouses have contributed equally to the acquisition of property during…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re LeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. In re the Marriage of Wolhaupter-HeinzelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. In re the Marriage of DullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API