United States v. Rappaport
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
Contrary to his pleas, the accused was convicted by a panel of officer members of violations of Articles 125, 133, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 933 and 934, respectively. The sentence to confinement for 6 months, partial forfeitures, and dismissal from the service was approved by the convening authority. The Court of Military Review, sitting en banc with two judges dissenting, dismissed one charge under Article 125 for lack of jurisdiction and set aside the findings and sentence based on a finding of prejudicial error (19 M.J. 708).
Whereupon,…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. KopitukCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Landis Cuber DothardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John J. O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. HicksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. MannUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.