Legal Opinion

People v. Tassell

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1984No. Crim. 22823PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, J.

After a jury trial, defendant David Tassell was convicted of kidnaping (Pen. Code, § 207), rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subds. (2), (3)), and forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a). He appeals, contending that the trial court erred in two respects: (1) by admitting evidence of two earlier sex offenses; and (2) by using prior convictions twice to enhance the sentence. We affirm the convictions, but remand for resentencing.

I

The convictions result from an incident with Anne B. on October 21, 1980. Miss B. testified that at the time she had been working as a waitress at a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. HelfantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API