United States v. Orange Jell Beechum
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
This case comes before the court en banc for reconsideration of this circuit’s doctrine on the admissibility of offenses extrinsic to a defendant’s indictment to prove his criminal intent.1 That doctrine, *903deriving in part from the case of United States v. Broadway, 477 F.2d 991 (5th Cir. 1973), requires that the essential physical elements of the extrinsic offense include those of the offense charged and that each of these elements be proved by plain, clear, and convincing evidence. We are here called upon to determine the effect of the recently enacted Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by995 opinions
- State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. CooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
990 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.