Legal Opinion

United States v. McDonald

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 5, 2004No. 03-0211/NAPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge CRAWFORD

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of committing indecent liberties with a child, one specification of indecent language toward the child, and one specification of soliciting sex with a child, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000). The convening authority approved the sentence of a dishonorable discharge, five years’ confinement, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence. United States v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. RankinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  2. United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. BareCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. BresnahanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API