Legal Opinion
People v. Daniels
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1953No. Crim. 4956PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*342VALLÉE, J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of a violation of the statute commonly known as the Machine Gun Law. He appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The statute provides: ‘ ‘ Section 1. On and after the date upon which this act takes effect every person, firm or corporation, who within the State of California sells, offers for sale, possesses or knowingly transports any firearms of the kind commonly known as a machine gun, except as herein prescribed, is guilty of a public offense.....” Section 2 defines a machine gun. (Stats. 1933, ch. 450, p. 1169;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Baender v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. Cappuccio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Brodsky v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Brown v. State Department of HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.