Legal Opinion

Baender v. Barnett

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1921No. 614PublishedCited by 60 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. -The ease is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

delivered, the opinion of the cpurt.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was indicted under § 169 of the Criminal Code, which declares that “whoever, without lawful authority, shall have in his possession” any die in the likeness or similitude of a die designated for making genuine coin of the United States shall be punished, etc. The indictment charged'that he “wilfully, knowingly” and without lawful authority had in his possession certain dies of that description. He entered a plea'of guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine and suffer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. United States v. MarigoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API