Legal Opinion

People v. McClennegen

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1925No. Docket No. Crim. 2718PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The defendants, twenty-seven in number, were jointly accused by an indictment presented against them by the grand jury of the county of Los Angeles of the crime of violating the Criminal Syndicalism Act of this state. (Stats. 1919, p. 281.) The indictment contains two separate counts, the first of which is framed under section 2, subdivision 4, of said act, and the second count charges a conspiracy, plan, and agreement to accomplish a change in industrial ownership and control in the existing economic and social system and also to effect political changes in this state and in the United…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. Tom WooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. SarazzawskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API