Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. Cappuccio, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1988No. F009724PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOLPERT, Acting P. J.
In a complaint filed in Monterey County Superior Court, defendants Frank and Santo Cappuccio, Cappuccio, Inc. (dba U. S. Freezer Co.), Rosaría Cappuccio, and Does I through X, were alleged to have committed unlawful business practices by understating the weight of squid purchased from fishermen, in violation of Fish and Game Code section 8011. It was also alleged that the understating of the weight resulted in defendants’ not paying the full tax due under Fish and Game Code section 8045. The failure to use the correct weight figures was further alleged to have…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hewlett v. Squaw Valley Ski Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. Fremont Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Churchill Village, L.L.C. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.