Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gulf Oil Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1954No. 666PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The.plaintiff contends that considering the evidence in the light most favorable to him, it makes out a case for the jury that the defendant was negligent in failing to install the pipes so as to prevent leakage. Considered in that light the evidence tended to show these facts : In the middle of April 1950 the defendant installed the pipes, pumps, etc., at his filling station. The pipes were installed in partially filled in ground, extra rocky soil, and covered with dirt. Automobiles and the Gulf truck frequently drove over the place. The plaintiff had no trouble with the No-Nox pump. When he…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Canady v. MannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API