Legal Opinion

Renner v. City of Marysville

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2010No. 81959-9PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 This case involves the question of what constitutes substantial compliance under former RCW 4.96.020(3) (2001), the local government tort claim filing statute. Marc Stephen Renner timely filed his claim for wrongful discharge with the city of Marysville but described the damages he would request instead of including a numerical amount, and he included one of his addresses for the six-month period preceding his discharge. The Court of Appeals concluded that Renner substantially complied with the statute, and we granted review on the question of Renner’s substantial compliance with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Troxell v. RAINIER PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Troxell v. Rainier Public School District No. 307Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Caron v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Renner v. City of MarysvilleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fast v. Kennewick Public Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Humphrey Industries v. Clay Street Assocs.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Adan Yusuf Ibrahim v. Drake, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API