Legal Opinion

Humphrey Industries v. Clay Street Assocs.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2010No. 82687-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

242 P.3d 846 (2010)

HUMPHREY INDUSTRIES, LTD, Petitioner,

v.

CLAY STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC; 615 Commerce LLC, Clay Associates Phase II LLC, Scott Rogel, Lori Goldfarb; Joseph Rogel and Lee Ann Rogel, husband and wife; ABO Investments, and Avram Investments, Respondents.

No. 82687-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 24, 2010.

Decided November 10, 2010.

David Christopher Spellman, Stanton Phillip Beck, Lane Powell PC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Gregory J. Hollon, Barbara Himes Schuknecht, McNaul Ebel Nawrot & Helgren, Alan B. Bornstein, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

J.M.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caitlin Cromar, Et Ano, V. Tag Realty, Llc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API