Legal Opinion
Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLC
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 2010No. 82687-1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶1 Humphrey Industries Ltd. by means of its principal, George Humphrey (collectively Humphrey), and with business partners Joseph and Ann Lee Rogel, Scott Rogel, and ABO Investments, by means of its principal, Gerald Ostroff, created Clay Street Associates LLC (Clay Street) to hold a single real estate asset located in Auburn, Washington. In order to break a deadlock with Humphrey regarding the sale of the property in late 2004, the other members of Clay Street agreed to merge the company into a new limited liability company with a different voting structure that could facilitate the sale.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- State v. DearboneWashington Supreme Court · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Humphrey Industries, Ltd. v. Clay Street Associates, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Deborah Ewing v. Green Tree Services LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Hall v. FeigenbaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Speelman v. Bellingham/Whatcom County Housing AuthoritiesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.