Legal Opinion
Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. VUTEk, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 21, 2008No. 2007-1515PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Leggett & Platt, Inc. and L & P Property Management Co. (collectively, “L & P”) sued Defendant-Appellee VUTEk, Inc. (“VUTEk”) alleging that certain of VUTEk’s large-scale printers infringe claims 1-3, 7, 9-10, and 19 of L & P’s U.S. Patent No. 6,755,518 (the “'518 patent”). VUTEk filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that the asserted claims of the '518 patent are invalid. The district court granted VUTEk’s motion, finding claims 1, 9, 10, and 19 of the '518 patent to be anticipated by a prior VUTEk patent and claims 2, 3, and 7 to be obvious…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Celeritas Technologies, Ltd., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- In Re SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Nicholas v. Perricone, M.D. v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Cruciferous Sprout LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Alpine Electronics of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Luv n' Care, Ltd. v. Mayborn USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.