Legal Opinion
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. AGA Medical Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 3, 2013No. 2012-1167PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Regents of the University of Minnesota (“the University”) owns U.S. Patent No. 6,077,281 (“the '281 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,077,291 (“the '291 patent”), which are directed to medical devices for repairing heart defects. The University accused AGA Medical Corporation (“AGA”) of infringing both patents. After claim construction, the district court granted summary judgment that the '291 patent was not infringed and that the asserted claims of the '281 patent were invalid as anticipated. The University appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Ge Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Agilight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Electronics Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Trivascular, Inc. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.