Legal Opinion
Innogenetics, N v. v. Abbott Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 17, 2008No. 2007-1145, 2007-1161PublishedCited by 185 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Abbott Laboratories (Abbott) appeals on a multitude of grounds the judgment en tered against it by the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin for infringement of Innogenet-ics, N.Y.’s (Innogenetics) U.S. Patent No. 5,846,704 (the '704 patent). We reverse and remand for a new trial the district court’s judgment as a matter of law that claim 1 of the '704 patent was not anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,580,718 (the Resnick patent). We also vacate the permanent injunction granted against Abbott. As for the whole host of other issues that Abbott…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.