Legal Opinion
Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2012No. Nos. 07 Civ. 11163(NRB), 08 Civ. 5706(NRB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Carotek, Inc. (“Carotek”) and Event Capturing Systems, Inc. (“ECS”) filed separate actions, now consolidated, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that three patents owned by defendant Kobayashi Ventures, LLC (“Kobayashi”) are invalid and unenforceable, and monetary relief based on unfair trade practices, interference with prospective advantage, fraud, and defamation. Kobayashi has asserted counterclaims for patent infringement and breach of a license agreement. Presently before us are the parties’ cross-motions for…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Radiancy, Inc. v. Viatek Consumer Products Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Martin Hilti Family Trust v. Knoedler Gallery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Mich & Mich TGR, Inc. v. BrazabraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Word to Info, Inc. v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.