Legal Opinion
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 26, 2010No. 2009-1281PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Enzo Biochem, Inc., Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., and Yale University (collectively, “Enzo”) appeal the grant of summary judgment by the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut in favor of Applera Corp. and Tropix, Inc. (collectively, “Applera”) that all asserted claims of U.S. Patents No. 5,328,824 (“the '824 patent”), No. 5,449,767 (“the '767 patent”), and No. 5,476,928 (“the '928 patent”) are invalid as either indefinite or anticipated, and that U.S. Patent No. 5,082,830 (“the '830 patent”) is not infringed. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp., No. 3:04-CV-929…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Davis v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Datamize, L.L.C. v. Plumtree Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Ddr Holdings, LLC v. hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.